A criminal conviction or adverse character history does not automatically end a person’s prospects of a New Zealand visa. In most circumstances, INZ has discretion to grant a visa despite a character concern. This is through a process known as a character waiver. But that discretion is narrow; it is exercised cautiously, and most waiver applications that are poorly prepared or misunderstood do not succeed.
If you or someone you are advising has a character issue that is affecting a visa application, understanding the actual test INZ applies and what a strong waiver application looks like is essential before you invest time and money in a process that is unlikely to succeed without the right preparation.
A character waiver is not an appeal against INZ’s character assessment. It is a request for INZ to exercise a discretion to grant a visa despite that assessment. The distinction matters because the preparation required is entirely different.
New Zealand’s Immigration Act 2009 and certified Immigration Instructions set out the character requirements that apply to all visa applicants. These include requirements relating to criminal convictions as well as other factors such as deportation history, adverse immigration history, and associations with certain organisations.
Not all criminal history triggers a character concern. The relevant thresholds depend on the nature and seriousness of the offending, the sentence imposed, and how long ago the offending occurred. Some charges/discharges may not raise character issues at all. Others (particularly those involving imprisonment) will, and the more serious and recent the offending, the more difficult the position.
Where a character issue exists, INZ has discretion to grant a visa if satisfied that it is appropriate in all the circumstances. INZ’s immigration instructions set out the factors relevant to that assessment: the seriousness and nature of the offending, the sentence imposed, the time elapsed since the offending, evidence of rehabilitation, the applicant’s ties to New Zealand, the consequences of declining the visa, and any compassionate or humanitarian factors.
This is not a checklist. INZ weighs these factors holistically, and the weight given to any particular factor will depend on the overall picture. An application that simply lists the relevant factors without explaining why they point in favour of the waiver being granted is unlikely to succeed.
The most common reasons character waiver applications fail are:
INZ is experienced at assessing these applications. A submission that reads as a template, or that focuses on the applicant’s good qualities without engaging with INZ’s specific concerns, will not move the dial. What moves the dial is a precise, honest, well-evidenced case that engages with the seriousness of the issue and makes a compelling argument for why the discretion should be exercised.
The strongest character waiver applications are those that acknowledge the seriousness of the issue, present detailed and credible evidence of rehabilitation, and make a clear argument for why the circumstances as a whole justify the exercise of discretion.
Character waiver applications sit at the intersection of legal analysis and persuasive advocacy. They require an understanding of INZ’s decision-making framework, an ability to present evidence in a way that addresses the specific concerns, and the judgment to know what to include, what to acknowledge, and how to frame the overall case.
These are not skills that are well-served by a do-it-yourself approach. The immigration instructions are technical. The way INZ assesses the factors is not always intuitive, and the consequences of a poorly constructed application can be significant.
Where a character issue is in play, legal advice before the application is lodged is not a luxury. It is part of the strategy.
Dalley Sundar advises on character waivers and complex immigration applications. If you have a character concern affecting your visa and want to understand your options, get in touch.